THE EDITOR, Madam:
As a former deputy commissioner (2004–2009), I advocated for the adoption of body-worn cameras (BWCs) in the Jamaica Constabulary Force (JCF). It is now 2024, and I am bewildered that these essential tools are not yet a standard issue. The recent Gleaner editorial rightly points out this glaring oversight, and I fully support its call for urgent action.
Why body-worn cameras are crucial:
1. Enhanced accountability: BWCs provide unbiased, recorded accounts of police interactions, fostering accountability and transparency within the force.
2. Evidence collection: BWC footage is crucial in investigations and court cases, often as pivotal evidence.
3. Reduction of complaints and misconduct: BWCs tend to lower complaints and misconduct allegations, strengthening community trust.
4. Improved officer behaviour: Knowing they are being recorded encourages officers to adhere strictly to protocols and exhibit professionalism.
5. Public trust and confidence: BWCs promote public confidence in police accountability, bolstering community relations.
6. Protection for officers: BWCs can protect officers from false allegations, providing evidence that supports their actions in contentious situations.
7. Training and development: Recorded footage is invaluable for training, helping officers learn from real-life scenarios and improve their responses.
8. Conflict resolution: BWC recordings can aid in resolving disputes and de-escalating potentially volatile situations.
9. Transparency in use-of-force incidents: BWCs provide clear insights into use-of-force incidents, aiding transparent investigations.
10. Policy adherence: BWCs help officers follow established policies and protocols, reinforcing best practices.
It is bewildering that despite the evident benefits and technological advancements over the past 15 years, the JCF has not fully embraced BWCs. The JCF has historically faced challenges with public trust; however, it has made positive strides in enhancing confidence under recent leadership and improved communication through social media. We must not jeopardise this progress by remaining resistant to proven technology.
It is astounding that police forces worldwide have benefited from BWCs for nearly two decades, overcoming initial challenges that we continue to cite as excuses — such as claims about attachment issues on uniforms. These challenges would have been resolved long ago if operational will existed, making BWCs a common sight among our officers.
The assertion that the “right” camera has yet to be found is a flimsy excuse rather than a legitimate reason. In this era of advanced solutions, finding a suitable BWC set-up is a matter of commitment, not capability. The time has come to prioritise BWCs across the JCF, ensuring our police force upholds the highest transparency, accountability, and trust standards.
In a world where anyone with a smartphone can record police interactions – often capturing only part of an incident and, at times, edited to the detriment of the police – BWCs provide an official, comprehensive record. Consider the recent example involving Greater Manchester Police at Manchester Airport, where footage initially showed an officer stamping on a man’s head. BWC and CCTV footage later clarified the violent attack on officers that preceded this incident. Without BWCs, such interactions’ context – and fairness – is often lost.
Let’s not let another year pass without making this vital leap forward. The integrity and efficacy of our policing depend on it.
MARK SHIELDS
Former Deputy Commissioner
of Police
Managing Director
Shields Crime & Security