Thu | Oct 31, 2024

Venezuela says December 3 referendum on border with Guyana will go ahead

Published:Friday | December 1, 2023 | 2:14 PM
A woman holds a Venezuelan flag and a book about the Essequibo territory dispute in Caracas, Venezuela, Wednesday, November 29, 2023. Venezuelans will attempt to decide the future of the Essequibo territory, a large swath of land that is administered and controlled by Guyana but claimed by Venezuela, via a referendum that the Venezuelan government put forth in its latest attempt to claim ownership, saying it was stolen when a north-south border was drawn more than a century ago. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

CARACAS, Venezuela, CMC – Venezuela Friday said it will continue with plans to hold the referendum called by the Electoral Branch at the request of the Parliament on Sunday regarding the ownership of the mineral and forest-rich county of Essequibo.

“Nothing and no one will prevent the Venezuelan people from expressing themselves freely on December 3 on their own, internal and extremely important issue, such as territorial integrity,” a government statement said.

The position comes amid a ruling by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) Friday that Venezuela must not take any action to seize the mineral and forest-rich county of Essequibo in Guyana based on its upcoming December 3 referendum.

But, Venezuela has signalled that it is not perturbed.

“Venezuela reiterates that it will firmly maintain its unwavering defence of international legality and the Geneva Agreement as the only legal instrument that allows reaching a practical and satisfactory solution for both parties, through friendly, political and peaceful negotiations.

“The truth of Venezuela and its inalienable sovereignty, constitutionality and self-determination have been victorious. On December 3, the Venezuelan people will go out to exercise their vote, for the first time in history, to defend their territorial integrity and will ratify that our rights over Guayana Esequiba are inalienable and unquestionable. The Sun of Venezuela is born in Essequib0,” the statement added.

The Nicolas Maduro government said that Venezuela “true to its historical position… does not recognise the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice to settle the territorial controversy surrounding Guayana Esequiba, especially given the existence of the 1966 Geneva Agreement”.

The Guyana government had earlier said it remains steadfast in its commitment to the international judicial process and the rule of law and is fully confident that, when the ICJ issues its final judgment on the merits of the case, it will conclude that the Essequibo “is legally and rightfully Guyanese territory.

“We believe that justice, not force, should be the arbiter of international disputes,” said President Irfaan Ali as he responded to the ICJ ruling.

The court ruled on Friday that Venezuela must not take any action to seize the mineral and forest-rich county of Essequibo in Guyana based on its upcoming December 3 referendum.

Both Georgetown and Caracas had made presentations to the ICJ during two days of hearing earlier this month into the case relating to the 1899 Arbitral Award after Guyana, in its request, had said that the Venezuela government, through its National Electoral Council had published a list of five questions that it intends to put before the people of Venezuela in a “Consultative Referendum” on Sunday.

In its ruling, the ICJ issued a number of provisional measures that “unanimously pending a final decision in the case, the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela shall refrain from taking any action, which would modify the situation that currently prevails in the territory in dispute, whereby the Cooperative Republic of Guyana administers and exercises control over that area”.

The ICJ said also that “unanimously both parties shall refrain from any action which might aggravate or extend the dispute before the court or make it more difficult to resolve.

“The court emphasises that the question of the validity of the 1899 Award and the related question of the definitive settlement of the land boundary dispute between Guyana and Venezuela are matters for the court to decide at the merits stage.

“The court recalls that Guyana has requested to indicate measures aimed at ensuring the non-aggravation of the dispute with Venezuela, when indicating provisional measures for the purpose of reserving specific rights.”

In its statement, Venezuela said that Guyana in its present case “had expressly requested that the consultative referendum not be held or that questions 1, 3 and 5 be modified.

“In its decision, the court rejected – as a whole – this unprecedented and unfounded request, which is related to a matter of the exclusive domain of Venezuela,” the Maduro government said, adding that “nothing in international law allowed the court to interfere in the internal affairs of Venezuela, nor to attempt to prohibit or modify a sovereign act organised within the framework of its participatory political system and based on its constitution.

“Likewise, with this decision it has been demonstrated that Guyana is not a victim, it has no titles over the disputed territory, it is a de facto occupier and has repeatedly violated the Geneva Agreement and international legality by unilaterally granting concessions in the land territory and in the waters pending to be delimited, as well as facilitating its territory for the military deployment in our region of the main warlike power on the planet.”

Follow The Gleaner on X, formerly Twitter, and Instagram @JamaicaGleaner and on Facebook @GleanerJamaica. Send us a message on WhatsApp at 1-876-499-0169 or email us at onlinefeedback@gleanerjm.com or editors@gleanerjm.com.