Is the IC above scrutiny?

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I am 68 years old, and over my many years I have voted for both parties, as I vote based on policy and issues. I am black, green and gold; neither orange nor green. Today, I am moved to write as a concerned citizen of Jamaica who watched the recent proceedings of the Integrity Commission (IC) Oversight Committee of Parliament.

What I witnessed was deeply troubling and left me angry at first, and, later, saddened.

During the session, members of the Integrity Commission, including its chairman and some senior staff, addressed the parliamentarians – the representatives of us, the people, in a manner that was, in my view, disrespectful and contemptuous. The dismissive tone and unprofessional conduct exhibited, and at times the petty behaviour, particularly by the chairman, fell far below the standards we expect from public officials, let alone those tasked with upholding the integrity of our nation.

Even more concerning was the chairman’s comment that he did not believe the Integrity Commissioners should be required to appear before Parliament for questioning. Is the IC above scrutiny? Should they not be held accountable to the people and the representatives we have elected?

It is with a heavy heart that, for the first time, I am now questioning the impartiality and motives of the commission.

Given the gravity of Tuesday’s events, I feel strongly that it is time for the current commissioners to resign.

BERNARD HEADLEY