Why the disparity in treatment at US embassies?

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I write to express my deep concern regarding the significant disparity in how visitors are treated at the US Embassy in Jamaica, compared to the US Embassy in London. This stark contrast has left me feeling disrespected and devalued.

In Jamaica, visitors to the US Embassy are seemingly expected to adhere to strict dress codes that discourage civilian clothing, while in London, individuals can attend their appointments in casual attire, such as shorts and sandals, without issue.

In Jamaica, visitors are prohibited from bringing items such as mobile phones, pens, electronics, lotions, and even water into the embassy. For those who do not drive, this means entrusting their phones and personal belongings to strangers on the street, for a fee which ranges from $1,000 to $3,000. This is not only inconvenient, but also unsafe.

In stark contrast, during my visit to the US Embassy in London, I was allowed to bring in my mobile phone, laptop, tablet, hand lotion, and even my backpack. Other patrons were comfortably sipping on their Starbucks drinks while waiting. To top it off, the embassy in London offered free Wi-Fi to help pass the time.

Why are we subjected to these outdated, draconian restrictions, while visitors in London are given modern conveniences? .

I am not seeking preferential treatment, but I do want to know why there is such a glaring disparity. I urge the US Embassy in Jamaica to reconsider its policies and afford its visitors the same respect and dignity that is extended elsewhere.

FRUSTRATED EMBASSY

VISITOR