Thu | Jan 2, 2025

Christianity is an easy target for ridicule

Published:Monday | August 12, 2024 | 12:06 AM

THE EDITOR, Madam:

I am writing to express my profound agreement with Kristen Gyles’ incisive column in The Gleaner of August 9 titled ‘Christianity as the easy target’. Her analysis of the controversial, artistic depiction at the Paris 2024 Olympics opening ceremony resonates deeply with me, particularly as someone who has experienced, while living, studying, working, courting, and raising children, the nuances of multicultural settings globally. Hers is mighty reasoning at its finest.

Gyles eloquently articulates the troubling trend where artistic expressions are increasingly used as a shield for what could be construed as hate speech, especially when it involves Christian symbols. The portrayal of Leonardo da Vinci’s The Last Supper with drag queens and a self-proclaimed lesbian ‘love activist’ as Jesus, was not only provocative, but seemed to disregard the sanctity of a revered religious icon. This incident, as Gyles points out, has sparked significant backlash from Christians worldwide, highlighting a perceived double standard in the realm of free speech.

In her column, Gyles raises a pertinent question: at what point does hate speech become artful and no longer hateful? This is a crucial inquiry in today’s world, where the boundaries between freedom of expression and respect for religious beliefs are increasingly blurred. The apology from the creative director of the Olympics, though unsteadily appreciated, underscores the need for sensitivity and inclusivity that genuinely respects all beliefs, rather than selectively targeting Christianity.

Gyles’ column also sheds unforgettably clear light on the broader issue of how Christianity is often singled out as an easy target for ridicule, while other religions are approached with caution due to potential severe repercussions. This disparity is troubling and calls for a re-evaluation of how artistic freedom is exercised and perceived.

Here’s the thing: I echo and shout Amen to Gyles’ sentiments and urge for a more balanced approach that respects all religious beliefs equally. Her column is a clarion call for introspection and action in ensuring that inclusivity does not come at the expense of respect for any faith.

DENNIS MINOTT